Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Date: 2000-10-09 20:35:18
Message-ID: 200010092035.QAA01665@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > >> What happens if you crash partway through?
> >
> > > what happens if you crash partway through a vacuum?
> >
> > Nothing. Vacuum is crash-safe. ALTER TABLE should be too.
>
> Sorry, that's what I meant ... why should marking a column as 'deleted'
> and running a 'vacuum' to clean up the physical table be any less
> crash-safe?

It is not. The only downside is 2x disk space to make new versions of
the tuple.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-09 20:46:14 Re: OSF/1/Digital UNIX/Tru64 UNIX spinlock code
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-10-09 20:30:05 Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN