| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Status of new relation file naming |
| Date: | 2000-09-12 21:35:30 |
| Message-ID: | 200009122135.RAA18180@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > depending on what it takes to implement, if we implement it now, that
> > > leaves ~1.5mos for someone to come up with a solution before release ...
> >
> > Well, we are 18 days from beta. Do we think we can handle that at this
> > time?
>
> My feeling was that the implementation was pretty much decided upon, it
> was just a matter of saying "go ahead, do it" ... so, "go ahead, do
> it" ... we have 18 days before beta, and then another 30 or so until
> release, which should have us releasing, what, around Jan 1, 2001? :)
Yes, Jan 1 would be my guess. My only question is whether we are making
things harder for administrators and whether putting some smarts in WAL
to keep readable file names would be easier.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-09-12 21:39:38 | Re: strange behaviour (bug) |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-09-12 21:32:26 | Re: Status of new relation file naming |