From: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ... |
Date: | 2000-09-08 14:53:12 |
Message-ID: | 20000908095312.B3429@rice.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marc -
If you're going to consider a point release, should we try to collect up
any other small patches that would go cleanly into the 7.0 tree? Just for
instance, the revised view rule name truncation patch I posted to PATCHES
that no one has commented on, yeah or neah. I don't think there are very
many of these: it seems to me that most small fixes that could be patched
to both trees, have been, but I haven't been trying to keep an accurate
count. (Hmm, Bruce's has been quiet this week. Is he on vacation?)
Ross
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 12:06:38AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> I have committed a fix into REL7_0 branch. Although it seems to work,
> > >> I don't trust it really far because it depends on heap_markpos() and
> > >> heap_restrpos(), which haven't been used in a long time and are full
> > >> of alarmed-sounding comments.
> >
>
> Thanks for the backpatch ...:)
>
>
--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-09-08 14:54:30 | Re: Proposal : changing table ownership |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-09-08 14:43:56 | Re: Proposal : changing table ownership |