| From: | Marcin Mazurek <M(dot)Mazurek(at)poznan(dot)multinet(dot)pl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: rules or trigers? |
| Date: | 2000-08-30 21:16:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20000830231612.A26624@poznan.mtl.pl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) napisał:
> See the problem? What you want is to lay your hands on the actual
> values that are getting inserted into "tab", and a rule cannot do that.
> But a trigger does exactly that.
and thats what I did a minute ago, works just fine, at least it looks like:)
> I am not sure whether this behavior of rules is a bug or a feature.
> I am sure that it would be difficult to change...
maybe somebody needs it that way, at least I have an option.
thx for Your help.
Marcin Mazurek
--
Kierownik Działu Systemowego
MULTINET SA o/Poznan
http://www.multinet.pl/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-30 21:41:04 | Re: PG 7.0 vacuum problem |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-08-30 21:12:18 | Re: rules or trigers? |