| From: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
|---|---|
| To: | reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] when does CREATE VIEW not create a view? |
| Date: | 2000-08-29 01:12:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20000829101238Y.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > Oh, the patch strikes me since it is not "multibyte aware." Are you
> > going to put it into the CVS? If so, please let me know after you do
> > it so that I could add the multibyte awareness to that.
>
> Well, I meant it to go into CVS, if noone objected. I consider your raising
> the multibyte issue sufficent objection to have it held off. No point
> patching and repatching.
No problem for repatching I think, since we are in the development
cycle anyway.
> The problem is that I just chop it off at NAMEDATALEN, which might be
> in the middle of a multibyte character, correct?
Exactly.
> Ah, I see code in parser/scan.l that does the multibyte aware version
> of the chop. Should I just rewrite my patch with that code as a model?
Please do so. If you need any help, please let me know.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Selle | 2000-08-29 03:09:45 | Re: Re: UNION JOIN vs UNION SELECT |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2000-08-29 01:07:25 | Re: Re: UNION JOIN vs UNION SELECT |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-08-29 04:15:40 | Re: [PATCHES] RE: Access PostgreSQL server via SSL/Internet |
| Previous Message | Alex Kapranoff | 2000-08-28 18:19:23 | Re: Unbreak plperl building |