From: | Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | bortzmeyer(at)pasteur(dot)fr |
Cc: | zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
Date: | 2000-07-20 18:01:30 |
Message-ID: | 200007201801.MAA13508@biology.nmsu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Even on Linux? I'm studying a database project where the raw data is 10 to 20
Gb (it will be in several tables in the same database). Linux has a limit of 2
Gb for a file (even on 64-bits machine, if I'm correct). A colleague told me
to use NetBSD instead, because PostgreSQL on a Linux machine cannot host more
than 2 Gb per database. Any practical experience? (I'm not interested in "It
should work".)
Postgresql and NetBSD work fine together. NetBSD has not had a 2GB
file limit for _many_ years and has raidframe for configuring huge
disks from many small ones (as well as for normal raid stuff).
Cheers,
Brook
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | James Hall | 2000-07-20 19:25:10 | Mailing List Archives? |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-20 17:23:11 | Re: Re: PostgreSQL vs MySQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erich | 2000-07-20 21:05:39 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-07-20 17:28:59 | Re: How PostgreSQL's floating-point hurts everyone everywhere |