| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeffery Collins <collins(at)onyx-technologies(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Connection pooling. |
| Date: | 2000-07-12 04:28:46 |
| Message-ID: | 200007120428.AAA06357@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It seems like a first step would be to just have postmaster cache unused
> connections. In other words if a client closes a connection, postmaster
> keeps the connection and the child process around for the next connect
> request. This has many of your advantages, but not all. However, it seems
> like it would be simpler than attempting to multiplex a connection between
> multiple clients.
>
This does seem like a good optimization.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-07-12 04:58:17 | RE: Vacuum only with 20% old tuples |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-07-12 04:24:40 | Re: Connection pooling. |