| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: more corruption |
| Date: | 2000-07-10 18:57:11 |
| Message-ID: | 200007101857.OAA00347@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, I had forgotten. The new table file names will make pg_upgrade
> > useless in the future.
>
> Hmm ... that's an implication I hadn't thought about. I wonder how much
> work it would be to get pg_upgrade to rename table files. Be a shame to
> throw pg_upgrade away after all the sweat we put into making it work ;-)
Seems impossible. The physical file names are not dumped by pg_dump, so
there is really no way to re-assocate the files with the table names.
Looks like a lost cause.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-10 18:58:18 | Re: more corruption |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-07-10 18:56:09 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL |