Re: more corruption

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: more corruption
Date: 2000-07-10 18:57:11
Message-ID: 200007101857.OAA00347@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, I had forgotten. The new table file names will make pg_upgrade
> > useless in the future.
>
> Hmm ... that's an implication I hadn't thought about. I wonder how much
> work it would be to get pg_upgrade to rename table files. Be a shame to
> throw pg_upgrade away after all the sweat we put into making it work ;-)

Seems impossible. The physical file names are not dumped by pg_dump, so
there is really no way to re-assocate the files with the table names.
Looks like a lost cause.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-10 18:58:18 Re: more corruption
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-07-10 18:56:09 Re: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL