Re: Two many databases...

From: Timothy Grant <tjg(at)exceptionalminds(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Two many databases...
Date: 2000-07-06 17:59:19
Message-ID: 20000706105919.A876@reepicheep.avalongroup.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 12:21:31PM +0200, Robert wrote:
> - each client gets separate database
>
> - one common database for all clients, each table has client_id field
> added

I'm not in your situation, but I can tell you that if you went with method
two, I would not recommend your services to my clients.

I work with many many law firms, and the possibility of their data getting
mixed up with someone elses (no matter how remote) would prevent me from
recommending that path.

While the maintenance is a bigger problem, I don't see it at nightmare
level. The biggest problem appears to occur when making table/index level
changes. I would think that it should be possible to write a wrapper for
those kind of updates that would make them across the board to each client.

--
Stand Fast,
tjg.

Timothy Grant tjg(at)exceptionalminds(dot)com
Chief Technology Officer www.exceptionalminds.com
Red Hat Certified Engineer (503) 246-3630
Avalon Technology Group, Inc. fax (503) 246-3124
>>>>>>>>>>>>Linux...Because crashing isn't normal<<<<<<<<<<<<<

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-07-06 18:03:28 Re: proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license
Previous Message Ron Peterson 2000-07-06 16:42:38 Re: proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license