From: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Ron Peterson <rpeterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license |
Date: | 2000-07-05 19:14:03 |
Message-ID: | 20000705121403.S25571@fw.wintelcom.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
* The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> [000705 12:03] wrote:
>
> just to curtail this while thread to a certain point ... switching the
> license to GPL is *not* on the table, nor has it every been, nor will it
> ever be ...
Good to hear, I was getting worried for a bit that the code might
become uselessly encumbered by a non-opensource friendly license.
Ignore the hype, keep the code _free_.
thanks,
-Alfred
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-07-05 20:54:43 | Re: proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-05 18:57:57 | Re: proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | selkovjr | 2000-07-05 19:19:28 | Re: responses to licensing discussion |
Previous Message | Timothy H. Keitt | 2000-07-05 19:10:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Denis Perchine | 2000-07-05 19:14:11 | Re[2]: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal) |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-05 18:57:57 | Re: proposed improvements to PostgreSQL license |