From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Blakeley <mike(at)blakeley(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: anyone heard of "recall"? |
Date: | 2000-06-28 17:55:11 |
Message-ID: | 200006281755.NAA20999@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Here's an interesting approach to redundancy - I wonder how much of a
> performance hit postgres would take if it optionally used this for
> underlying table storage?
> http://www.fault-tolerant.org/recall/recall-faq.html
>
> Browsing through the cvs tree, I even see a postgres directory -
> apparently they're doing some work on exactly this idea, and have run
> into some stumbling blocks. I know that replication questions and
> RFEs pop up frequently on this list - maybe this'll provide a
> solution for some folks.
Yes, looks interesting.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-28 17:55:25 | Re: Lingering Backend Processes |
Previous Message | Michael Blakeley | 2000-06-28 17:48:50 | anyone heard of "recall"? |