Re: make_ctags script

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: make_ctags script
Date: 2000-06-09 12:19:44
Message-ID: 200006091219.IAA18100@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Slightly off topic: While going through the current source, comparing
> to Mariposa, I've seen little traces of old code: some ideas seem to
> have been reinvented and reimplemented a number of times. Going back
> and digging into Postgres95, and the last postquel based release,
> postgres-v4r2, to see how they were implemented, it's been fun seeing
> "debate/design by comment block" from some of the original university
> developers. In particular, one block with a 12 line NOOOOOO! in
> backend/commands/version.c had me rolling on the floor. Ah, I see it lives
> on in _deadcode. In general, the functional comments in the current code
> are more informative, but not as much fun ;-)

What I have realized is how superior some of our code is to the old
stuff.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-06-09 12:30:55 RE: New Globe
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-09 12:12:52 Re: Deferred trigger queue