Re: column aliases

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: column aliases
Date: 2000-06-08 03:51:52
Message-ID: 200006080351.XAA12572@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> What it looks like to me is that we have a bug in the expansion of '*'.
> >> It should be generating columns for both the explicit and the implicit
> >> FROM clause, but it's evidently deciding that it should only produce
> >> output columns for the first one.
>
> Looks like the behavior is still the same (except now it says
> NOTICE: Adding missing FROM-clause entry for table pg_language
> as well). I'm inclined to say we should change it, and am willing
> to do the work if no one objects...

Which part, the expansion of * or the warning code?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-06-08 04:07:44 RE: DROP COLUMN status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-08 03:43:25 Re: column aliases