From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys |
Date: | 2000-06-01 17:57:34 |
Message-ID: | 200006011757.NAA18771@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO list.
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> What though if a function accesses a table? Which one goes first? Do we
> >> have to maintain a network of dependencies in pg_dump? Eventually we'll
> >> probably have to, with all the foreign key stuff coming up. Gloomy
> >> prospects.
>
> Couldn't we solve this by the simple expedient of dumping all the
> objects in the database in OID order?
>
> Expecting pg_dump to parse function bodies to discover what
> relations/types are mentioned doesn't look appetizing at all...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ************
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith Parks | 2000-06-01 20:31:17 | Problems with recent CVS versions and Solaris. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-01 17:18:29 | Re: 2700-byte prosrc limit fixed? |