| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>, pghackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: vacuum analyze feedback |
| Date: | 2000-05-26 03:31:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200005260331.XAA25287@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> At 15:54 25/05/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >Yes, I think eventually, we need to feed information about actual query
> >results back into the optimizer for use in later queries.
> >
>
> You could be a little more ambituous and do what Dec/Rdb does - use the
> results of current query execution to (possibly) cause a change in the
> current strategy.
>
yes.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2000-05-26 03:31:33 | Re: vacuum analyze feedback |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-05-26 03:17:18 | smgrwrite() without LockBuffer(was RE: Shouldn't flush dirty buffers at shutdown ?) |