| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER |
| Date: | 2000-05-26 01:31:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200005260131.VAA19027@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > If you don't get rid of those then your parser will behave in surprising
> > ways. So far you have noticed the fallout from only one of those
> > conflicts, but every one of them is a potential bug. Be advised that
> > gram.y patches that create unresolved conflicts will *not* be accepted.
>
> I thought shift/reduce conflicts were part and parcel of most language
> syntaxes. reduce/reduce being rather more naughty. The standard syntax
> already produces 95 shift/reduce conflicts. Can you clarify about
> unresolved conflicts not being accepted?
What? I get zero here. shift/reduce is sloppy programming. We don't
do that here. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2000-05-26 01:34:32 | Re: \dS and \df <pattern> crashing psql |
| Previous Message | Kevin Lo | 2000-05-26 01:21:40 | [DONE] PostgreSQL-7.0 binary for WinNT |