From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: gram.y PROBLEM with UNDER |
Date: | 2000-05-25 23:15:59 |
Message-ID: | 200005252315.TAA13042@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 04:49:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, even I don't apply those, though they say I never met a patch I
> > > > didn't like. :-)
> > >
> > > Bruce, your going to _make_ me grovel through the archives, and prove
> > > that you were the first one to say that aren't you?
> >
> > I believe it was a Thomas Lockhart line.
>
> O.K., first one _I_ saw say that.
>
> Ross
> P.S. you do all us occasional patchers a great service. Don't change a
> thing ;-)
I am always ready to back stuff out if someone objects. People
certainly like quick patch application. Makes them feel we value their
contributions, which we do.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-25 23:49:50 | Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-25 23:14:29 | Re: Any reason to use pg_dumpall on an idle database |