| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Last call for comments: fmgr rewrite [LONG] |
| Date: | 2000-05-22 04:18:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200005220418.AAA12026@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > No, because we aren't ever going to be dynamically allocating these
> > things; they'll be local variables in the calling function.
>
> Fair enough then. Although that being the case, I don't see the big deal
> about using a few more bytes of stack space which costs absolutely
> nothing, even though the binary compatibility is a small but still real
> advantage.
I like Tom's clean design better. Flexibility for little payback
usually just messes up clarity of the code.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-22 04:19:45 | Logging (was Re: PostgreSQL 7.0-2 RPMset released.) |
| Previous Message | Michael A. Olson | 2000-05-22 04:09:27 | Re: Berkeley DB... |