| From: | "Matthias Urlichs" <smurf(at)noris(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Matthias Urlichs <smurf(at)noris(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, monty(at)mysql(dot)org, sinisia(at)mysql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2000-05-21 04:34:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20000521063413.N11220@noris.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Mike Mascari:
> MySQL has type mediumint
> PostgreSQL has transactions
>
> MySQL allows 'and' as string markers
> PostgreSQL has views
Look, we all know that transaction support is more important than type
mediumint or the function ODBC LENGTH or cosine or whatever.
But what should I, or anybody else, do about it, in your opinion? Take
the "unimportant" tests out? Invent a couple of inconsequential stuff
PostgreSQL can do to balance the book? Repeat the "transactions=no"
entry in the crash-me results file ten times?
> See? Equal. I hope my sarcasm is not too overstated.
Sarcasm hasn't helped in the past, and it's unlikely to help in the future.
--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network GmbH | smurf(at)noris(dot)de | ICQ: 20193661
The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de/
--
Lemme through! I'm a necrophiliac!
-- overheard at a traffic accident
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-21 04:45:58 | Re: More Performance |
| Previous Message | Matthias Urlichs | 2000-05-21 04:26:46 | Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-21 04:45:58 | Re: More Performance |
| Previous Message | Matthias Urlichs | 2000-05-21 04:26:46 | Re: MySQL crashme test and PostgreSQL |