Re: Performance

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>
Cc: Diego Schvartzman <dschvar(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Lista PGSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance
Date: 2000-05-19 14:56:42
Message-ID: 200005191456.KAA04454@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> I think the "VACUUM ANALYZE" solution should be given great prominence in
> the FAQ.
>
> Possibly add to:
> 4.9) My queries are slow or don't make use of the indexes. Why?
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq-english.html#4.9
>
> New first lines:
> Make sure relevant indexes exist (see 4.8) then try VACUUM ANALYZE from psql.
>
> If that doesn't work, read the rest. And if THAT doesn't clear things up,
> then it's something which the mailing lists and developers probably want to
> know.

Good, I added one sentence to the top of the FAQ answer stating VACUUM
ANALYZE and try again.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-19 15:06:55 Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-19 14:24:02 Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))