Re: setproctitle() no longer used?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Date: 2000-05-10 23:02:20
Message-ID: 200005102302.TAA13363@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Wed, 10 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > D'oh, okay...I ended up going through the v6.5.* source code too, and
> > > couldn't find it there. I forget how Bruce had implemented it using
> > > argv[0], and yes, it is definitely broken on FreeBSD 4.0 ...
> > >
> > > I'll look at doing the change here locally, since I know
> > > setproctitle() does work, as I find it invaluable to know what is running,
> > > and where ...
> >
> > Can you find out if it is broken, or they have stopped supporting it in
> > FreeBSD.
>
> In 4.0-Rel they're not saying it's gone or going away, just that you
> need to link with -lutil if you use it. They also state that there's
> no standard but that they believe they're using the predominant
> convention.

So if you use -lutil, the argv[0] trick works, and if you don't, it
doesn't? If so, we can get that into the FreeBSD template.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-05-10 23:06:21 Re: setproctitle() no longer used?
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-05-10 22:59:38 Re: setproctitle() no longer used?