Re: So we're in agreement....

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Sverre H(dot) Huseby" <sverrehu(at)online(dot)no>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So we're in agreement....
Date: 2000-05-07 03:43:06
Message-ID: 200005070343.XAA28607@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

>
> So, we're going to go with less security then is available on most Unix
> OSs?
>
> if we are going to do this, *please* just use the regular system
> crypt() function ... for those that are using MD5 for their passwords, at
> least as it is under FreeBSD, crypt() does either MD5 or DES depending on
> the system ...
>

We have to use MD5 with double-encription. We have to do that because
all clients need MD5 too, and we can't assume they all have DES.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-07 04:03:16 Re: So we're in agreement....
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-05-07 03:42:01 Re: So we're in agreement....

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-07 04:03:16 Re: So we're in agreement....
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2000-05-07 03:42:01 Re: So we're in agreement....