| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt? |
| Date: | 2000-05-05 05:42:28 |
| Message-ID: | 200005050542.BAA12739@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> okay, something that I think needs to be clarified ... RC5 requires an
> initdb, so you have to do a pg_dumpall first, then initdb, then reload ...
>
> your recent fixes ... should we be running pg_dumpall from RC5 on our RC4
> databases, or does it not matter? I'm using the RC5 one right now, and
> all appears correct, but I figured I'd ask ...
Doesn't matter, except that RC5 dumps groups properly.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-05-05 05:44:28 | Re: [CRITICAL PATCH] Release Candidate 5 ... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-05 05:41:37 | Re: [CRITICAL PATCH] Release Candidate 5 ... |