Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> I griped about that a week or so ago, but no one seems to have picked up
> >> on it. Do you want to consider that a "must fix" problem as well?
> >> I think it's a pretty minor fix, but considering how late we are in the
> >> cycle...
>
> > considering where the problem is, I think that if it can be safely done,
> > please do it ...
>
> Done and done. I also realized that pg_upgrade had another nasty bug
> in it: the VACUUMs were not necessarily executed as superuser, but as
> whichever user happened to own the item dumped last by pg_dump in each
> database. That would result in VACUUM skipping over tables it thought
> it didn't have permission to vacuum --- like, say, all the system
> tables. Perhaps this explains the failures that some people have
> reported.
>
> Another day, another bug swatted ...

Yes, good eye. Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026