Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: shmem_seq may be a bad idea
Date: 2000-05-05 04:06:05
Message-ID: 200005050406.AAA08909@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> However, IPC_EXCL would definitely make us more robust against other
> sorts of conflicts, so I agree that's a good change to make. TODO
> list entry, please, Bruce?
> * Use IPC_EXCL when creating shared memory and semaphores

Done.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-05 04:11:42 Re: ``..Advice For New Immigrants...
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-05-05 04:04:15 [CRITICAL PATCH] Release Candidate 5 ...