Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch
Date: 2000-05-02 21:26:48
Message-ID: 200005022126.RAA25556@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Our code even masks a real table created in the same session. Once
> > the temp table is dropped, the real table becomes visible again. See
> > the regression tests for an example of this.
>
> The real problem here is that there's no way of finding out whether you
> just dropped the temporary table or the "real" one or whether a table is
> temporary at all. Sure you can perhaps look into pg_class but tell that to
> users.

Do a \d on the table. If it doesn't show up, it is temporary. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-05-02 21:28:14 Re: RE: [PATCHES] relation filename patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-02 21:26:09 Re: Proposal for fixing intra-query memory leaks