Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
Cc: "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Mount (Home)" <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: 2000-05-02 11:02:29
Message-ID: 200005021102.HAA08318@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> Yes, the README does need updating. CHANGELOG should be up to date. If
> not, I'll have to re-commit it.
>
> I'm hoping to have the next three evenings free...

Not to bug you Peter, but 7.0 may not wait three days before release.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-02 11:07:37 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 11:01:04 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-05-02 11:07:37 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 11:01:04 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status