Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for Grand Unified Configuration scheme
Date: 2000-03-07 03:31:56
Message-ID: 200003070331.WAA03864@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I have (almost) nothing to do for about 3 weeks, so I thought I'd get
> started on some stuff for next time around.

Lucky you

> The idea here is to unify all the various configuration settings into one
> coherent scheme. This would include:
>
> [...]
>
> Let me know what you think. Don't be rushed if you have other things to do
> right now.

Sounds good to me.

Jan from Philly

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ross J. Reedstrom 2000-03-07 05:04:43 Re: [HACKERS] sqgfault on initdb with current CVS
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2000-03-07 01:34:56 Re: [HACKERS] TransactionStateData and AbsoluteTime