Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Date: 2000-02-28 02:34:55
Message-ID: 200002280234.VAA14532@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > > Wow, that almost seems to easy to be true. I never thought that having
> > > tuples of different structures in the table at the same time would be
> > > possible. If so then I don't see a reason why this would be too hard to
> > > do.
> >
> > If the transaction is not committed, I don't think anything actually
> > reads the tuple columns, so you are safe.
> >
>
> Hmm,tuples of multiple version in a table ?
> This is neither clean nor easy for me.
> There's no such stuff which takes the case into account,AFAIK.
>
> Seems no one but me object to it. I'm tired of this issue and it's
> painful for me to continue discussion further in my poor English.
> I may be able to provide another implementation on trial and it
> may be easier than only objecting to your proposal.
> Is it OK ?

Sure, whatever you want. No one is going to start coding anything for a
while. Seemed like a clean solution with no rename() problems.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-02-28 03:21:36 RE: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-28 02:30:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN