From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Rolf Grossmann <grossman(at)securitas(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
Date: | 2000-02-24 16:00:49 |
Message-ID: | 200002241600.LAA23055@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Yes, but are there cases where we would want psqlrc values set? Should
> > we specifically set all the variables ourselves on startup, just
> > over-riding what is in psqlrc?
>
> No. In the first place, we've already got a dozen or two SET variables
> (and the list keeps changing); do you really want to reset all of those
> in each regress test? In the second place, a psqlrc script could screw
> things up in more creative ways than just issuing SET commands. IIRC,
> Rolf's original example was a psqlrc that issued a BEGIN to leave the
> system in an open-transaction state. In the third place, the psql echo
> output from any commands issued by psqlrc would itself be enough to
> cause bogus "failures" of all the tests.
>
Yes, I see. Just asking.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-24 16:03:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-24 15:59:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-24 16:01:51 | Re: [HACKERS] Changes in 7.0 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-02-24 15:59:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |