Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, webmaster(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Date: 2000-02-22 14:18:02
Message-ID: 200002221418.JAA16211@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > Those are the two major user-visible loose ends with this feature.
> > >
> > > What about ALTER TABLE table DROP CONSTRAINT? I see this:
> > >
> > > alter table t1 drop constraint t1_fk cascade;
> > > ERROR: ALTER TABLE / DROP CONSTRAINT is not implemented
> > >
> > > Note that we seem to have ALTER TABLE table ADD CONSTRAINT, though.
> >
> > I thought that was going in. According to Marc, if it sufficiently
> > warned users, and required them to type it twice, it would do Peter's
> > alter table code. Perhaps Peter decided to wait for 7.1?
>
> Ummm...I don't recall ever talking about DROP CONTRAINT *raised eyebrow*

Again, I am a goof. I was thinking of DROP COLUMN.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-02-22 14:43:32 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-22 14:15:54 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?