Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Date: 2000-02-22 05:43:37
Message-ID: 200002220543.AAA29726@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> ERROR: ALTER TABLE / DROP CONSTRAINT is not implemented
>
> > I thought that was going in. According to Marc, if it sufficiently
> > warned users, and required them to type it twice, it would do Peter's
> > alter table code. Perhaps Peter decided to wait for 7.1?
>
> I thought the rest of us beat him up until he took it out ;-)

Yes, he was badly beaten up about it, but I felt that the code as is was
pretty good, considering how bad CLUSTER is. If people are told the
limitations, it could be a win.

I felt that the more advanced features like not using 2x disk space were
quite hard to implement, considering the other TODO items. Marc agreed
and was going to e-mail him to tell him that with proper user warning,
we wanted the patch.

Do people disagree?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-02-22 05:53:30 Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2000-02-22 05:40:25 Re: [HACKERS] TODO list / why 7.0 ?