| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jeff MacDonald <jeff(at)pgsql(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced |
| Date: | 2000-02-15 16:01:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200002151601.LAA04685@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Now that's a good question. If we rephrase our tag to:
> "Most Advanced Open Source ORDBMS" it's not a problem.
>
> However, it really depends upon what apects in which we consider
> ourselves to be the "Most Advanced" -- what is "Advanced" in that
> context? Are we advanced in terms of features, or are we advanced in
> terms of our development process? I believe we are advanced in both
> regards -- and we're certainly the most advanced when it comes to
> maturity of development in an open source fashion -- advanced in age in
> that context.
>
> Until InterBase is released open source, it remains to be seen how
> advanced of an open source database it will be.
Is Interbase any good? I never heard of them much. Sounds like it is a
PC database like dbase, right? They don't scale very well.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-02-15 16:48:06 | Re: [HACKERS] Most Advanced |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-02-15 15:59:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Release on the 15th? |