Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem
Date: 2000-02-14 16:14:44
Message-ID: 20000214161444.D13823@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 11:00:16AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
>
> > + if (!string)
> > + elog(ERROR, "Trying to convert NULL text to integer (int2)");
>
> This is unreasonable behavior. The correct patch is just
>
> if (!string)
> return 0;
>
> which will allow the function manager to plow ahead with returning the
> NULL that it's going to return anyway. See the past pghackers threads
> about redesigning the function manager interface if you don't understand
> what's going on here.

Off top of head, that means that null and the string "0" both return 0..
OK - I'll look for the mail thread.

Cheers,

Patrick

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-02-14 16:50:36 Programmers needed to implement Replication ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-14 16:00:16 Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem