Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes
Date: 2000-02-11 06:41:10
Message-ID: 20000211074110.B1289@fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 05:12:54PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> That's very nice and all, but psql doesn't work that way. I'm not sure how
> other dbs organize their front-end internally, but that sort of scheme
> would really take psql places we might not want it to go, and for which it
> hasn't been designed -- namely, to be a programming language.

I wonder why we compare apples and oranges here. Of course esqlc was
designed to be parse a programming language while psql is a query tool.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De | Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 2000-02-11 06:57:59 Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-11 06:41:07 Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases