From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes |
Date: | 2000-02-11 06:41:10 |
Message-ID: | 20000211074110.B1289@fam-meskes.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 05:12:54PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> That's very nice and all, but psql doesn't work that way. I'm not sure how
> other dbs organize their front-end internally, but that sort of scheme
> would really take psql places we might not want it to go, and for which it
> hasn't been designed -- namely, to be a programming language.
I wonder why we compare apples and oranges here. Of course esqlc was
designed to be parse a programming language while psql is a query tool.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De | Use PostgreSQL!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-02-11 06:57:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Solution for LIMIT cost estimation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-02-11 06:41:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Almost there on column aliases |