Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brian E Gallew <geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes
Date: 2000-02-10 16:06:22
Message-ID: 200002101606.LAA05833@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Urhm, wouldn't a better idea be to have something like Ingres' "ON
> ERROR" and "ON WARNING" settings? In Ingres esqlc, you can create
> functions and then tell Ingres to execute them in the even of a
> warning or error. Also, you can say "ON ERROR CONTINUE" and errors
> will then be returned to the application as a status, but otherwise
> ignored.
>

Yes, seems like those are the accepted words to use.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-10 16:08:14 Re: [HACKERS] createdb default arguments
Previous Message Brian E Gallew 2000-02-10 16:02:32 Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes