Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Ordering of pg_dump output
Date: 2000-02-08 16:38:02
Message-ID: 200002081638.LAA29037@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Yeah, it's a known bug. We can't just dump the functions first,
> though, can we? I'm not sure how carefully function definitions
> get examined by CREATE FUNCTION.
>
> The simplest real solution I've heard so far is to dump database objects
> in order by OID rather than doing it strictly by type.
>
> Is anyone working on this, or does anyone want to? I haven't looked at
> pg_dump in a while, but I know some other folks have been hacking it
> recently.

I thought Peter E. was thinking about it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-02-08 16:38:53 Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-02-08 16:29:36 Re: [HACKERS] psql and libpq fixes