Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Now, how to convert these? Not supplying the ops works fine, but
> > pg_dump supplies the ops. Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops,
> > we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few
> > releases. Comments?
>
> Ugly, but probably the best stopgap for backwards compatibility ...
> at least I can't think of a better answer, since we have no way to
> change what 6.5 pg_dump will dump.
>
> You're only going to suppress "network_ops" if it appears in the
> ops position of a CREATE INDEX, right? Don't want to stop people
> from using the name for fields and so on.

No, just at that part in the grammar.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026