From: | mathprof(at)bigfoot(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] DefineQueryRewrite: rule plan string too big-- |
Date: | 2000-02-05 00:39:37 |
Message-ID: | 200002050040.SAA01753@ogopogo.flash.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks... I found a sort of workaround that might help others. It's
possible to make views from other views, so I solved my problem by
creating an auxilary "viewname1" which did some of the work, and then
created a view "viewname" on "viewname1" which did the rest of the work.
Ugly and probably inefficient, but it seems to work!
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Ed Loehr wrote:
> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 01:03:35 -0600
> From: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
> To: mathprof(at)bigfoot(dot)com
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] DefineQueryRewrite: rule plan string too big-- workaround?
>
> mathprof(at)bigfoot(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > I created what I thought was a fairly simple view, and got back:
> >
> > ERROR: DefineQueryRewrite: rule plan string too big.
> >
> > The limit for the rule plan string also seems awfully small-- my view
> > isn't more than a few lines long.
> >
> > Thoughts or help?
>
> A very frequent problem, many reports in the list archive...Broken (or
> shall I say unusable) since March, 1998, if I read the archives
> correctly...IIRC, rumored to be fixed in v7.0 sometime in the coming
> months...Until then, answer seems to be to make smaller views.
> Bummer, yes.
>
> Cheers,
> Ed Loehr
>
> ************
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | davidb | 2000-02-05 00:48:33 | Re: [GENERAL] using ID as a key |
Previous Message | kaiq | 2000-02-04 23:39:06 | Re: [GENERAL] using ID as a key |