From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Nicolas Huillard <nhuillard(at)ghs(dot)fr> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org>, "pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Date: | 2000-01-27 17:59:00 |
Message-ID: | 200001271759.MAA26324@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> I haven't got the opportunity to recompile Postgres right now, but will do that. Just reading the code, I can't figure out the exact difference, but who knows...
> Did someone already applied this ?
No, not sure how to deal with it.
>
> Nicolas Huillard
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De: Hiroshi Inoue [SMTP:Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp]
> Date: jeudi 27 janvier 2000 17:31
> _: Nicolas Huillard
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org; pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org
> Objet: RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Nicolas Huillard
> >
> > I have a DB with is updated using MS Access. Primary keys are
> > Int4 with default random values ("Num_roAuto" + "Al_atoire" in Access).
> > The DB is migrated as-is in Postgres, with tbl_prod.cle_prod
> > field containing values from -2057496808 to 2139583719.
> > When I SELECT in the table, using the INT4 cle_prod value, PG
> > doesn't find the tuple. When I SELECT using the VARCHAR(10)
> > ref_prod value, PG finds the tuple, and show the right value for
> > the cle_prod filed : the same as the one I SELECTed for...
> >
> > This sounds like the long negative integer values given in PSQL
> > is not converted correctly while executing.
> > Using a long positive integer value, all works like a charm...
> >
> > Below is the queries type sto sho what append.
> > I'm using Postgres 6.5.2 from the RPMs.
> >
>
> Could you try the follwoing patch ?
>
> Regards.
>
> Hiroshi Inoue
>
> *** nbtcompare.c 2000/01/11 03:33:34 1.3
> --- nbtcompare.c 2000/01/19 05:42:06
> ***************
> *** 34,40 ****
> int32
> btint4cmp(int32 a, int32 b)
> {
> ! return a - b;
> }
>
> int32
> --- 34,45 ----
> int32
> btint4cmp(int32 a, int32 b)
> {
> ! if (a > b)
> ! return 1;
> ! else if (a == b)
> ! return 0;
> ! else
> ! return -1;
> }
>
> int32
>
>
>
> ************
>
>
> ************
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Huynh, Long | 2000-01-27 19:16:10 | |
Previous Message | Terence Gannon | 2000-01-27 17:58:22 | Large Functions and Index Rebuild |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gabriel Fernandez | 2000-01-27 18:07:22 | Problems with create temporary table and select ... into |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-27 17:52:37 | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |