From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
Cc: | "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] column aliases |
Date: | 2000-01-24 16:29:20 |
Message-ID: | 200001241629.LAA16455@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > >This may go a long way towards explaining why people have been so
> > >readily confused by the implicit-FROM-clause business!
> >
> > It *is* confusing, that's for sure!
>
> IMHO, if there exists a from clause, we could insist,
> that all tables are listed (no implicitly added table),
> since it is really too error prone.
>
> What I would not like to see removed is the ability to
> avoid the from clause alltogether. Like in:
>
> select xor.eval;
This is an interesting suggestion. I wonder if we can do this. We can
avoid producing NOTICE messages in this case.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-01-24 16:34:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-24 16:06:55 | Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) |