Re: [HACKERS] column aliases

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] column aliases
Date: 2000-01-24 16:29:20
Message-ID: 200001241629.LAA16455@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > >This may go a long way towards explaining why people have been so
> > >readily confused by the implicit-FROM-clause business!
> >
> > It *is* confusing, that's for sure!
>
> IMHO, if there exists a from clause, we could insist,
> that all tables are listed (no implicitly added table),
> since it is really too error prone.
>
> What I would not like to see removed is the ability to
> avoid the from clause alltogether. Like in:
>
> select xor.eval;

This is an interesting suggestion. I wonder if we can do this. We can
avoid producing NOTICE messages in this case.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-01-24 16:34:22 Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-24 16:06:55 Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3)