Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster)

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, prlw1(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster)
Date: 2000-01-23 06:02:56
Message-ID: 20000122220256.H26520@fw.wintelcom.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [000122 21:50] wrote:
>
> >
> > These patches revert the default setting of the non-block flag back
> > to the old way connections were done. Since i'm unable to reproduce
> > this bug I'm hoping people can _please_ give me feedback.
>
> Patch appled. And thanks very much for the patch. I am sorry you were
> given a bad time about your previous patch. We will try to not let it
> happen again.

I really hope the originator of the problem report will get back to
us to make sure it's settled.

*poking Patrick Welche*

:)

thanks,
-Alfred

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-01-23 07:05:11 Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-01-23 05:58:30 Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping