Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitry Samersoff <dms(at)wplus(dot)net>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum
Date: 2000-01-18 20:45:47
Message-ID: 200001182045.PAA26658@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Well, one would hope you have enough disk space free for that.
>
> At least noticed by vacuum
>
> > ...
> > Rename() causes the link named from to be renamed as to. If to exists, it
> > is first removed. Both from and to must be of the same type (that is,
>
> Ok. I agree.
>

You start to think this way when you start looking for conflicting
situations.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-18 22:32:55 Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum
Previous Message Dmitry Samersoff 2000-01-18 20:24:44 Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum