Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dmitry Samersoff <dms(at)wplus(dot)net>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum
Date: 2000-01-18 19:42:24
Message-ID: 200001181942.OAA17153@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > My idea would be to create a new index that is a random index name.
> > Then, do rename(), which is an atomic OS operation putting the new index
> > file in place of the old name. Seems that would work well.
>
> Yes, but it can cause disk space problem for very large indices.
> Moreover, you need firts unlink old index file than do rename(),
> it is not atomic.
>
> May be better way is to create tmp file containing index description,
> undestandable for vacuum.

The beauty of doing a temp index while keeping the old one is that you
can recover right away, and maybe allow the old index to be used while
you vacuum?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2000-01-18 19:53:04 Re: [PATCHES] docs done Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-18 19:37:31 Re: [PATCHES] docs done Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ...