Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog (pg_type.h)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)hub(dot)org>, committers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog (pg_type.h)
Date: 2000-01-17 16:17:26
Message-ID: 200001171617.LAA29019@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Hmm, numeric array type was missing too. Added.
> > Of the standard types, only 'timestamp' seems not to have an array
> > type; should it be added, or are we going to remove that type for 7.0
> > anyway?
>
> Will be removed/replaced.

We are going to internally move everything to the more standard ANSI
names, right, or do we give preference to the older types?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-17 16:17:58 Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-17 16:15:49 Re: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c)