From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Xun Cheng <xun(at)cs(dot)ucsb(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed |
Date: | 2000-01-14 02:20:56 |
Message-ID: | 200001140220.VAA26503@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> This would need to be done to implement some sort of tablespace-style
> facility, too, right? I'm off Xun's thread in asking but I've been
> wondering. DBs like Oracle allow you to place tables and indices
> whereever you like in the filesystem. This is normally done to
> distribute things across different spindles, and in large, busy
> databases makes a significant difference. I've done some experimenting
> moving index files to a different spindle (using "ln" to fool
> postgres, of course) and insertions go measurably faster. Spindles
> are so cheap nowadays :)
WAL will add the oid to the base file name. That may make tablespaces
easier.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-01-14 02:32:44 | Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed |
Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-01-14 02:19:33 | Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed |