Re: [GENERAL] Simulating an outer join

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Julian Scarfe <jscarfe(at)callnetuk(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Simulating an outer join
Date: 2000-01-13 13:06:37
Message-ID: 200001131306.IAA24854@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I am just writing the EXISTS section from my book. I don't think it
> > matters what fields are returned from an EXISTS subquery. If I am
> > wrong, someone please let me know.
>
> Celko also writes (in his chapter on EXISTS in "SQL for Smarties"):
>
> "In general the SELECT * option should perform better than the actual column.
> It lets the query optimizer decide which column to use. If a column has an
> index on it, then simply seeing a pointer to the index is enough to determine
> that something exists."
>
> Obviously you're in a much better position than me to judge whether that's the
> case in pgsql! But it might be worth a test.

In psql, I think * would generate all the columns, then throw it away,
while a specific column would only carry around that column in the
subquery result. so a single column is better.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message admin 2000-01-13 13:38:45 searching oid's
Previous Message Chana Slutzkin 2000-01-13 11:21:58