From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated |
Date: | 2000-01-13 02:34:15 |
Message-ID: | 200001130234.VAA26834@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> >
> > > Hmmm,who solved ????
> > > * -spinlock stuck problem when elog(FATAL) and elog(ERROR) inside bufmgr
> >
> > I thought you or Tatsuo fixed that. I will remove the mark.
> >
>
> I have had a fix for it for 3 months but not committed because I don't
> know how WAL would change it.
> OK I would commit it after some checking.
Ah, so my memory isn't that bad. WAL is not going into 7.0, so it
should be fine.
> > We currently do not use indexes to handle ORDER BY because it is slower,
> > but for queries returning only a few rows, we could use the index and
> > skip the ORDER BY. Not sure if this is done yet, or if it is important.
> >
>
> Tom has changed to take IndexScan into account even when no qual exists.
> * -Allow optimizer to prefer plans that match ORDER BY(Tom)
> Currently optimizer is too eager to use index scan. He is planning to take
> limit into account AFAIK, He has mentioned it many times and I have been
> looking forward to his change.
OK, TODO updated.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-13 02:41:28 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated |
Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-13 02:19:00 | RE: [HACKERS] TODO list updated |