| From: | Jim Mercer <jim(at)reptiles(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | tayers(at)bridge(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] identifying performance hits: how to ??? |
| Date: | 2000-01-12 19:06:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20000112140611.V4188@reptiles.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 01:09:08PM -0500, tayers(at)bridge(dot)com wrote:
> J> nagoss=> \h vacuum
> J> Command: vacuum
> J> Description: vacuum the database, i.e. cleans out deleted records, updates statistics
> J> Syntax:
> J> VACUUM [VERBOSE] [ANALYZE] [table]
> J> or
> J> VACUUM [VERBOSE] ANALYZE [table [(attr1, ...attrN)]];
>
> J> what is the correct syntax for doing a vacuum analyse?
>
> The correct syntax as shown in the help message is
> 'vacuum analyze'. Notice the alternative spelling of analyse with a
> 'z' not an 's'.
>
> Hope you have a very nice day, :-)
[ picture of jim slapping himself in the forehead ]
geez.
i know it was right in front of me, but, grrrr.
[ in his best homer simpson voice ] Doh!
--
[ Jim Mercer jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 506-0654 ]
[ Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood ]
[ Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code. ]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Culberson, Philip | 2000-01-12 19:58:19 | RE: [GENERAL] Simulating an outer join |
| Previous Message | T.D. Brace | 2000-01-12 18:35:56 | Postgresql vs Mysql |