Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version

From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version
Date: 2000-01-11 09:40:56
Message-ID: 200001110940.JAA28524@linda.lfix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>"Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> There appear to have been changes in the shared library libpq.
>> Since the library has changed, it needs to have a new version number.
>
>You're right, we need to bump the number before release (and I hope we
>remember!). Past practice has not been to bump the number during
>development cycles, since we'd shortly have ridiculously high version
>numbers if we incremented them at every development change.

Yes, but it should be bumped the first time it changes; I agree that it
need not be increased during later development of the same release.

A patch would be superfluous. The necessary change is simply to
increment SO_MINOR_VERSION in src/interfaces/libpq/Makefile

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
========================================
"Enter into his gates with thanksgiving, and into his
courts with praise. Be thankful unto him, and bless
his name." Psalms 100:4

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mateus Cordeiro Inssa 2000-01-11 10:45:51 Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-01-11 06:03:22 INDEX_MAX_KEYS = 16 ... it works, too